Skip to main content
NursingPapersHelp home

NURS 7111 · DNP Project Implementation

DNP implementation report: measuring the rollout of Eat, Sleep, Console with implementation outcomes

A DNP implementation report on moving a nursery to the Eat, Sleep, Console approach, tracked with Proctor's eight implementation outcomes.
Course
NURS 7111: DNP Project Implementation
University
University of Minnesota
Level
Doctoral (DNP)
Type
DNP project
Length
6 pages
Style
APA 7

This is an original excerpt written by our team to show structure, depth and referencing. It is modelled on the course named above but is not a university document. Use samples as a study guide and follow your school's academic integrity policy.

The practice change

The newborn nursery and neonatal unit in this project care for infants with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome using the Finnegan scoring tool, which often leads to medication and long hospital stays. The project replaces it with the Eat, Sleep, Console (ESC) approach, which focuses on whether the infant can eat, sleep and be consoled, and puts nonpharmacological care led by parents first. The units and their figures are illustrative.

Evidence for ESC

In a cluster-randomized trial at 26 US hospitals, 1,305 infants born at 36 weeks' gestation or later with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome were enrolled as hospitals moved, at randomly assigned times, from usual care with the Finnegan tool to ESC. Among infants who met the trial's definition of medical readiness for discharge, the time from birth to readiness was 8.2 days with ESC and 14.9 days with usual care (adjusted mean difference 6.7 days). Adverse outcomes were similar in the two groups (Young et al., 2023).

Why implementation outcomes

Knowing an intervention works in a trial doesn't show whether it is being delivered well locally. Proctor et al. (2011) proposed eight implementation outcomes that are conceptually distinct from clinical outcomes: acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration and sustainability. Measuring them helps explain why clinical results do or don't improve.

Implementation outcomes at 3 months

Outcome Measure Result
Acceptability Staff survey on satisfaction with ESC 81% of nurses agreed ESC was an improvement
Adoption Percentage of nurses who completed training and used ESC 94% trained; 88% documented at least one ESC assessment
Appropriateness Staff and parent views of fit with family-centered care Parents valued being involved; some nurses worried about infants whose parents couldn't stay
Feasibility Time to complete an ESC assessment Median 6 minutes per assessment
Fidelity Audit of 30 charts against the ESC protocol 77% fully followed, including the team "huddle" when an infant didn't meet criteria
Implementation cost Training hours and cuddler volunteer coordination 2 hours of training per nurse; 0.2 full-time equivalent for volunteer coordination
Penetration Percentage of eligible infants managed with ESC 90%
Sustainability Planned review at 12 months Champions named on each shift; ESC added to orientation

The figures are illustrative.

Interpreting the results

Adoption and penetration were high, but fidelity lagged. The most common gap was skipping the huddle that the protocol requires before starting medication, often on night shift. That matters, because a clinical outcome such as length of stay could worsen if medication decisions drift back toward score-based habits. The appropriateness finding about infants without a parent present led to a new cuddler volunteer schedule and guidance for nurses in providing consoling care themselves.

Next Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle

  1. Add a huddle prompt to the electronic record when an infant does not meet ESC criteria.
  2. Provide night-shift refresher sessions led by champions.
  3. Re-audit fidelity in 6 weeks, aiming for at least 90%.

Clinical outcomes to report alongside

Length of stay, the percentage of infants receiving opioid medication, readmissions within 30 days and breastfeeding at discharge, all compared with the baseline year.

References

Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7

Young, L. W., Ounpraseuth, S. T., Merhar, S. L., Hu, Z., Simon, A. E., Bremer, A. A., Lee, J. Y., Das, A., Crawford, M. M., Greenberg, R. G., Smith, P. B., Poindexter, B. B., Higgins, R. D., Walsh, M. C., Rice, W., Paul, D. A., Maxwell, J. R., Telang, S., Fung, C. M., . . . Devlin, L. A. (2023). Eat, Sleep, Console approach or usual care for neonatal opioid withdrawal. New England Journal of Medicine, 388(25), 2326–2337. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2214470

Ready when your deadline is.

Get your exact price in seconds. No account, no card details on our site.